EXCLUSIVE LIVE–April Gallop’s attorney William Veale _ on the Kevin Barrett Show

This show was broadcast July 19, 2011.
It is now archived here — Use Player

Coming up Tuesday at 9:00 am Pacific – 12:00 PM Eastern – 16:00 GMT
Will be archived here after the broadcast by Tuesday evening.

April GallopKevin Barrett

EXCLUSIVE LIVE–April Gallop’s attorney William Veale
Breaking news: Bush’s cousin sanctions Gallop/Veal for requesting recusal in 9/11 case!

Email your questions or comments now.

Hear the latest developments in the case of Gallop v. Cheney, Rumsfeld, and Myers being heard by the United States Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit. April Gallop, a Pentagon employee injured (along with her baby son) in the 9/11/2001 false-flag bombing, is suing three of the suspected perpetrators – Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, and Richard Meyers.

The following is from Kevin Barrett’s blog:

We at Truth Jihad Radio hereby award the Larry Silverstein Award for Chutzpah Above and Beyond the Call of Duty to…Federal Court Judge William Walker, George H.W. Bush’s cousin and thus George W. Bush’s second cousin.

Judge Walker and his two co-panelists have issued punitive sanctions against April Gallop’s lawyers, including William Veale. Why? Because Gallop’s legal team made a motion to recuse Walker from judging a lawsuit against Bush II Administration Officials, accusing those officials of orchestrating the 9/11 attacks.

This is the second set of sanctions Walker has slapped on Gallop’s lawyers. The first was for bringing what Walker considered a “frivolous” lawsuit against his cousin.

Judge Walker did not merely dismiss the motion and refuse to recuse himself from a case arguing that his cousin’s administration perpetrated the worst crime in US history. (No conflict of interest there!) He dismissed the motion AND sanctioned Veale for bringing it! This after having already sanctioned Gallop and her lawyers for bringing the case in the first place!!

In today’s America, federal judges apparently think that they have no conflict of interest judging cases arguing that their own family members are involved in horrendous crimes…and if anybody thinks they do, sanction them!

Had this rule been in force before 9/11 “changed everything,” Judge Luciano could have presided over a case against his aptly-named son Lucky…Judge Manson could have presided over the case against her poor misunderstood son Charlie…Judge Gein could have sat in on the case claiming that his eccentric but generally decent nephew Eddie was making lampshades out of illicit materials…and all those cases could have been dismissed, with sanctions against those who brought them…and additional sanctions for asking the judges to recuse themselves!

Email 7-18-2011 from William Veale follows:
How do you guys like these apples?
First, Bush’s cousin is on the 2nd Circuit panel. Motion to DQ denied.
Second, Panel affirms, finding appeal and case frivolous, and issues OSC for Sanctions.
Third, we move to recuse panel for the Bush problem and bias as evidenced in their failure to allude to any of our facts and for finding facts against us without a denial by the defendants. Motion denied and 2nd OSC for maliciously and in bad faith disparaging the court by making motion to recuse. Exposed nerve? Truth?
Read as you like.

NEW YORK, March 23, 2011 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ —
A December 2010 poll conducted by the prestigious Emnid Institute, and reported in the German magazine “Welt der Wunder,” revealed that 89.5% of German respondents do not believe the official story of 9/11.

The issue is heating up in America as well, and will soon be heard in court.

Top Secret Military Specialist April Gallop saw disturbing things up close that have not been reported in the media.

On the morning of September 11, 2001, she was ordered by her supervisor to go directly to work at the Pentagon, before dropping off her ten-week-old son Elisha at day care.

Amazingly, the infant was given immediate security clearance upon arrival.

The instant Gallop turned on her computer an enormous explosion blew her out of her chair, knocking her momentarily unconscious.

Escaping through the hole reportedly made by Flight 77, she saw no signs of an aircraft – no seats, luggage, metal, or human remains. Her watch (and other clocks nearby) had stopped at 9:30-9:31 a.m., seven minutes before the Pentagon was allegedly struck at 9:38 a.m.

The 9/11 Commission reported that “by no later than 9:18 a.m., FAA centers in Indianapolis, Cleveland, and Washington were aware that Flight 77 was missing and that two aircraft had struck the World Trade Center.”

Why then were there no anti-aircraft defenses, Gallop asks, or alarm warnings inside the Pentagon?

Gallop was briefed by officials not to tell her story in public; she also received an email from a Fox News reporter who had been told by the Pentagon not to interview her.

Gallop now believes that officials within the Bush Administration conspired to destroy the Twin Towers of the World Trade Center and WTC 7 – the third building brought down at 5:20 p.m. that day – with pre-placed explosives detonated after the planes hit.

On April 5th, 2011, at 11 a.m., at the Federal Courthouse at 141 Church Street in New Haven, Connecticut, the case of Gallop v. Cheney, Rumsfeld, and Myers will be heard by the United States Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit.

Gallop’s case relies on virtually all forms of evidence admissible in court, but significantly, on published scientific evidence that residues of these explosives were found in the rubble after the attacks. In its totality the proffered case establishes that the government hypothesis – that the buildings collapsed due to fire in combination with the airplane impacts – is scientifically untenable.

In addition, Ms. Gallop will, through photographic and other physical evidence, as well as the testimony of a multitude of military and civilian survivors, demonstrate the impossibility of her having lived through the attack on the Pentagon if it had taken place as the government and the defendants claim.

German Federal Judge, Deiter Dieseroth, stated in December 2009 that:

“No independent court has applied legal procedures to review the available evidence on who was responsible for the attacks.”

Also, that “it is not acceptable for a constitutional state…to declare war, bomb a foreign country, and place it under military occupation,” without first identifying suspects.

Dieseroth also said the U.S. “was under burden of proof” that Osama bin Laden was responsible for the attacks, yet the FBI admits it has no evidence presentable in court to back this up.

The stakes in this case are epic, including the possibility of an overwhelming transformation of the world’s understanding of history, not to mention American citizens’ relationship with their government.

Check out Kevin’s new book: Questioning the War on Terror: A Primer for Obama Voters.

The Kevin Barrett Show is independently produced and hosted by Kevin Barrett and these shows are externally produced content. All externally produced content broadcast on No Lies Radio is the sole responsibility of the program-content producer and is not the responsibility of NoLiesRadio.org. Any questions or concerns should be directed to the content producer.


Comments are closed.


June 2022
« May    

User Login