Bollyn: I allege 9/11 occured because of Israel’s influence.

Hufschmid: 9/11 was a jew job, let’s hang them in the streets.

On the other hand, if you understate your case instead of overstating it, you’ll have more credibility because people will assume you exercised the same caution in gathering and vetting your evidence as you did in presenting it.

I’m saying he’s hurting his case by overstating it.

He said he’d identify who and where the nanothermite was developed. But it turns out he has only circumstantial evidence. The Israeli scientist is researching the right kind of explosives at the right time. I think there’s a good chance Bollyn is right. But what Bollyn’s got is at this point an interesting and suspicious connection, not a certainty or proof of anything.

He should present it as such, and let people connect their own dots. The way Kevin Ryan has done with his piece on connections between various WTC occupants and their interconnections with nanothermite and the NIST investigative team. It doesn’t prove anything and Ryan never implies it does, but the series of “coincidences” is suggestive enough to let people draw their own conclusions: there is a reasonable likelihood that there is indeed something to all these suspicious interconnections. We’ll never be able to “prove” anything until we have a real investigation with subpoena power (probably never). We have only suspects in such cases. But we can still use probabilities as a basis for action, while recognizing them as such.

Steven Jones has produce more experimentation and research than NIST. Oh yes, it’s so easy just to go down to walmart and buy nanothermite for experiments. Do you really think nanothermite manufactures would sale their product to the average citizen? lolololol

Jones has performed experiments with thermite and thermate, however, just try and procure nanothermite.

Those people who speak against him have their own agenda, or they have not done the research themselves. Math and fact never fail, that is where the truth is.

Not that I approve of Kevin “Webfairy is as credible as Steven Jones” Barrett, but this interview was interesting.

Bollyn digs up some important facts and connections – but hurts his case by overstating it.

Circumstantial evidence can be quite strong but it should be stated as such. It’s only weakened by being overstated.

Thank you to Kevin Barrett for finally bringing Bollyn into the discussion. Bollyn brings together much of the circumstantial and what looks to be (if his facts are right) empirical evidence of Israeli involvement in 911. Can anyone refute his work? I have not seen such a refutation to date.

Thank you, Concrete man

Foreigners know and accept the 911 deception story better than dumbed down Americans who believe the poop on and in the MSM. And, if they continue to do so, they will have to live with more of the same poop happening to the USA over and over again until all privacy and individual rights are completely gone.