911 Truth Researcher Christopher Bollyn
It is now archived here — Use Player
Coming up Tuesday at 9:00 am Pacific – 12:00 Noon Eastern – 16:00 GMT
Will be archived here after the broadcast by Tuesday evening.
“THE KEVIN BARRETT SHOW”
Tuesday Hear a Live Interview with 9/11 Truth
Independent Researcher, Journalist, and Author Christopher Bollyn
Email your questions now.
I appeared on the radio program “The Kevin Barrett Show” on September 1. The one-hour discussion focused on my book Solving 9-11: The Deception that Changed the World and the discovery of super-thermite in the dust of the World Trade Center. …..
I described my thesis that Shimon Peres and his gang of nuclear criminals are the real architects behind the false-flag terror of 9-11. Peres is the creator of Israel’s illegal nuclear weapons arsenal and I suspect that it was at his “nuke” complex near Dimona in the Negev Desert that the nano-thermite used on 9-11 was designed. It should be noted that Israel’s illegal nucear arsenal was built by Peres, the current president of Israel and Capo di tutti capi, or head of the international Zionist crime gang based in Tel Aviv. The super-thermite used on 9-11 was developed for years prior to September 11, 2001, at Israel’s Nuclear Research Center – Negev near Dimona, and in affiliated Israeli universities and institutions. Shimon Peres best friend, Arnon Milchan, is the owner of one of Israel’s largest chemical companies.
Arnon Milchan is also a friend and business partner of Rupert Murdoch, owner of News Corp. and Fox News, and Josef Maiman, the Mossadnik who controls the gas riches of Turkmenistan. Building a pipeline to carry the Israeli-owned gas of Turkmenistan to India and China is the real strategy behind the war in Afghanistan.
Barrett asked me how such a small group can dominate and control such a large nation as the United States. “They run the whole show,” is how I would answer this question in one sentence. They control the media that informs Americans, the law enforcement agencies, the courts, the money, and the political process. This control is maintained by their exclusive secret society, B’nai B’rith and their allegiance to their collective.
Obtaining nano-size iron oxide and aluminum to create super-Thermite is no problem for an old weapons smuggler like Milchan, who smuggled nuclear triggers to Israel in the 1980s. Peres’ gang members have stolen plutonium from Pennsylvania and hijacked ship loads of uranium to build their nuclear arsenal and have never been held to account. The Mossadniks who smuggled plutonium to Israel later tried to get the security contract for the World Trade Center, as I write about in my book. Israeli scientists simply took American and European nano-technology for energetic films and tweaked them to suit their purpose to pulverize the World Trade Center on 9-11.
Super-Thermite was used to pulverize the Twin Towers. The architects of this false-flag terror never thought that traces of their nano-thermite would be found in the dust. They were wrong. This advanced nano-composite explosive was evidently applied to the interior surfaces of the WTC as a thin film, like a primer or spray coating. Remaining bi-layered chips of this super-thermite detonated at 430 degrees Celsius and released more energy per mass than any other known explosive used in demolition (Jones, 2009). The only questions left to be answered are: “Who made the stuff?” and “Who put it in the Twin Towers?” We can say with a high degree of certainty that it was not Osama Bin Laden and Al Qaida. There is no Arab state or army that has access to this level of nano-technology. This means the government and media have been lying to us about 9-11 for 8 years.
The above statement is quoted from Christopher Bollyn’s website. Visit his website here for more details. Christopher Bollyn’s book can be read online for FREE HERE.
Deadline for emailed questions is 9pm Pacific Time, Monday, August 31st. Not all emailed questions will be answered on the air.
The Kevin Barrett Show is independently produced and hosted by Kevin Barrett and these shows are externally produced content. All externally produced content broadcast on No Lies Radio is the sole responsibility of the program-content producer and is not the responsibility of NoLiesRadio.org. Any questions or concerns should be directed to the content producer.
Capitalism: A Love Story. On the 20-year anniversary of his groundbreaking masterpiece "Roger & Me," Michael Moore's "Capitalism: A Love Story" comes home to the issue he's been examining throughout his career: the disastrous impact of corporate dominance on the everyday lives of Americans. But this time the culprit is much bigger than General Motors, and the crime scene is far wider than Flint, Michigan. This is a newly released DVD.
Loose Change 9/11: An American Coup. 
[...] CLICK HERE TO LISTEN The one-hour radio discussion focus is on the book “Solving 9-11: The Deception that Changed the World” by Christopher Bollyn and the extremely serious implications of the discovery of super-thermite in the dust of the World Trade Center. [...]
I was sad to hear Mr Bollyn say that nanothermite was “more explosive than any known explosive”.
This simply is not true.
It is quite clear that the WTC buildings were demolished by explosives, but the hyperbole of Mr Bollyn does little to add credibility to the truth movement.
People should listen up to what Mr. Bollyn has to say. He has been through much to bring this information to the international public.
Foreigners know and accept the 911 deception story better than dumbed down Americans who believe the poop on and in the MSM. And, if they continue to do so, they will have to live with more of the same poop happening to the USA over and over again until all privacy and individual rights are completely gone.
Robert may be right that Bollyn does not have all his facts correct, I do not know. But I find Bollyn’s thesis intuitively convincing based upon our well documented knowledge of Israeli false flag terror operations. Not to mention the massive Zionist power configuration in the US which weighs heavily on political, financial and media issues (see works by James Petras, Stephen Sniegowski, Mark Glenn, Michael Collins Piper, Walt and Mearsheimer, just off the top of my head). No question that the 911 Truth Movement is infiltrated by Zionist agents, apologists and dupes. Most people will not talk about Jewish Power even if they are not “agents” because of the deeply embedded social implication of being called “anti semitic”. Have you noticed that you cannot open up the newspaper or watch a Hollywood movie without some reference to the Holocaust? The reason for this is that the Zioniost power structure uses the Holocaust and WWII (see: Inglourious Basterds) as a bludgeon over the heads of the gullible goyim to make sure they don’t forget about Jewish supremicism and uniqueness.
Thank you to Kevin Barrett for finally bringing Bollyn into the discussion. Bollyn brings together much of the circumstantial and what looks to be (if his facts are right) empirical evidence of Israeli involvement in 911. Can anyone refute his work? I have not seen such a refutation to date.
Thank you, Concrete man
I have to agree with Mr. Heath.
Bollyn digs up some important facts and connections – but hurts his case by overstating it.
Circumstantial evidence can be quite strong but it should be stated as such. It’s only weakened by being overstated.
Why are these 9/11 researchers so reluctant to take the next step? Now that this nanothermite has been identified by Niels Harrit and Steven Jones, who claim that it was painted on the WTC steel, it’s time to get some of it, a steel column, a paint brush or roller, and a video recorder and demonstrate how it works.
Disregard the pesky fact that there was no evidence of explosives or incendiaries in the WTC debris, and at least show everyone that the idea is plausible.
I can’t believe you all are trying to say Mr. Bollyn’s intentions aren’t good. Whatever small details he may be incorrect on does not remove the other amazing information of this nazi-like kobal that’s destroying the world. I listen to RBN but I don’t listen to the fool-idiots who try to dirty Bollyn’s name. Mike Piper and others who piss on Bollyn’s reputation are intelligent but show serious immaturity when airing their personal issue with Bollyn. There are many in this movement who are intelligent but immature and they need to grow up. I went to school with smart kids whose parents didn’t show them how to fully be an adult. These kids grew up to be smart but still maintained certain pettiness in their behavior. Bollyn is a powerful investigator and the tiffs other have with him should not reflect on his amazing ability to find the answers. Heath is not thinking for himself. Bollyn may have mis-spoke but his has not mis-led us.
Bollyn’s research is not wrong-headed, but is extremely tainted by his association with the most obviously insane character in the 9/11 truth movement, namely one Eric Hufschmid. Bollyn tries to make it seem like he doesn’t have a clue about his associates, but I don’t buy it anymore. Nobody can be that incompetent. Bollyn’s “work” only damages the truth movement, since much of his stuff in unverifiable (he rarely provides sources), and he is already widely regarded as a paranoid nutjob like his partner Hufschmid.
Not that I approve of Kevin “Webfairy is as credible as Steven Jones” Barrett, but this interview was interesting.
Mr. Bollyn speaks from the mind and heart, a dedicated researcher to who I value for an Unbiased POV.
Those people who speak against him have their own agenda, or they have not done the research themselves. Math and fact never fail, that is where the truth is.
Quote from Albury
“Why are these 9/11 researchers so reluctant to take the next step? Now that this nanothermite has been identified by Niels Harrit and Steven Jones, who claim that it was painted on the WTC steel, it’s time to get some of it, a steel column, a paint brush or roller, and a video recorder and demonstrate how it works.”
Steven Jones has produce more experimentation and research than NIST. Oh yes, it’s so easy just to go down to walmart and buy nanothermite for experiments. Do you really think nanothermite manufactures would sale their product to the average citizen? lolololol
Jones has performed experiments with thermite and thermate, however, just try and procure nanothermite.
I’m not saying I think Bollyn is an agent.
I’m saying he’s hurting his case by overstating it.
He said he’d identify who and where the nanothermite was developed. But it turns out he has only circumstantial evidence. The Israeli scientist is researching the right kind of explosives at the right time. I think there’s a good chance Bollyn is right. But what Bollyn’s got is at this point an interesting and suspicious connection, not a certainty or proof of anything.
He should present it as such, and let people connect their own dots. The way Kevin Ryan has done with his piece on connections between various WTC occupants and their interconnections with nanothermite and the NIST investigative team. It doesn’t prove anything and Ryan never implies it does, but the series of “coincidences” is suggestive enough to let people draw their own conclusions: there is a reasonable likelihood that there is indeed something to all these suspicious interconnections. We’ll never be able to “prove” anything until we have a real investigation with subpoena power (probably never). We have only suspects in such cases. But we can still use probabilities as a basis for action, while recognizing them as such.
My basic point is that it hurts your credibility on a basic level to overstate your case: people may not know whether or not your evidence is real without checking it, but they know right away if you said at the beginning you were going to prove something, and then it turns out you only have inconclusive circumstantial evidence.
On the other hand, if you understate your case instead of overstating it, you’ll have more credibility because people will assume you exercised the same caution in gathering and vetting your evidence as you did in presenting it.
Hufschmid would find more success if he could tone it down a bit. Reading through his site is not for the newbie. When exposing people to Hufschmid’s information I always have to issue disclaimers. “You can go here to learn about what happened/what is happening, but you’re going to have to weed through a bit of racism and violence advocacy. It sucks how those things just make people not even care about what he’s saying even if it is true. There’s a big difference in presentation between:
Bollyn: I allege 9/11 occured because of Israel’s influence.
Hufschmid: 9/11 was a jew job, let’s hang them in the streets.
[...] I was on the radio program “Fair and Balanced with Kevin Barrett” on September 1. The one-hour discussion focused on my book Solving 9-11: The Deception that Changed the World and the discovery of super-thermite in the dust of the World Trade Center. The program is archived and can be listened to at: http://noliesradio.org/archives/4961 [...]