Vladimir Putin Implicitly Attacks the Neoconservative Mafia, the Neo-Liberal Ideology and the NWO in Syria

Veterans Today – By Jonas E. Alexis – April 16, 2016


Vladimir Putin has implicitly been stirring up the Neoconservative pot for quite a long time, but the real confrontation came to a full bloom when he stood up against the New World Order in Syria.

Vladmir Putin has called a spade a spade in the political realm again. The “deep state” in the United States, Putin has recently announced, has largely been ruled by two political currents: the Neoconservative Mafia on the one hand and the Neoliberal ideology on the other. For Putin, George W. Bush and Hillary Clinton are classic manifestations of those ideologies.

We all know by now that Bush was a complete disaster for the United States and the Middle East, and even “Prince of Darkness” Richard Perle himself declared that Bush did not make decisions,[1] which means that he was a dancing puppet internalizing the commands of America’s oppressors. Hillary, Putin seems to be saying, is treading on the same path.[2]

This observation is not without evidence. Hillary said last year that she was “in the category of people who wanted to do more in reaction to the annexation of Crimea.”[3] She compared Putin to Hitler numerous times in the past.[4] It seems reasonable that Putin would take the political ball and swing back to her and the Neoconservative Mafia. According to analyst Beau Grosscup of California State University,

“What President Putin is referring to is the neo-conservative/liberal within the National Security State (NSS) that has set the strategic goals of US foreign policy since the end of the Cold War.”[5]

In other words, if you want to understand the deep forces that post beneath political categories in the United States, you will have to look at the Neoconservative and Neoliberal agendas. If you doubt this assessment, then pay close attention to the New York Times here: “When it comes to nominating presidential candidates, it turns out the world’s foremost democracy [US] is not so purely democratic.”[6]

The U.S. “is not so purely democratic” because the Dreadful Few, who are less than five percent of the population, are able to tell presidential candidates what to do, what to say, and how to say it. They have been able to buy presidential candidates like Ted Cruz with no problem. And one needn’t be a politician to realize that people like Cruz are just puppets, always ready to do whatever their bosses enunciate or initiate.

So, Putin is right in line with rational thought again. He has implicitly been stirring up the Neoconservative pot for quite a long time,[7] but the real confrontation came to a full bloom when he stood up against the New World Order in Syria. This was obviously death to the Neoconservatives, who always pursue their diabolical appetite behind their unbridled and lustful passion in places like Ukraine.[8]

The Neocons and so-called Neoliberals, who also have been pursuing the Israeli agenda in Syria,[9] have never forgiven Putin for his past sins. In 2014, liberal Zionist Peter Beinart implicitly and incoherently declared that Putin and the Neocons are basically two sides of the same coin,[10] but that sophomoric judgment was based on flimsy presuppositions.

For example, Beinart clung to the now debunked view that Putin invaded Crimea and compared that act to “America’s behavior in Kosovo, Afghanistan, Iraq, and Libya.”[11] Nothing could be further from the truth.

In his entire analysis, Beinart ignored the fact that 97% of Crimeans backed Vladimir Putin.[12] We can reasonably deduce that the 3% who did not vote for Putin were part of the oligarchs, namely, largely Jewish revolutionaries like Victoria Nuland and others, who told the EU to “fuck” off.

Beinart obviously knew about this fact, but his liberal Zionist position does not allow him to think in ways that are compatible with the moral and political order. But how did the oligarchs in Washington react to the 97% figure?

Well, they completely dismissed that fact and moved on to pursue their own Neoconservative agenda in the region.[13] In a completely perverse way, the Obama administration responded by saying that the conflict could still be resolved diplomatically “in a way that addresses the interests of both Russia and the people of Ukraine.’”[14]

How stupid can it get? The administration forgot to mention that there is a large Russian population living in Crimea. Let us hypothetically play that scenario in the United States. Suppose Al Gore had won the presidential election in 2000 by 95% or 97%. After the dismal lost, suppose the five or three percent came up and declared,

“We have to think about this democratically. Gore’s position is undemocratic and is therefore wrong. We are right. If our ideas are not part of his project, then it must be wrong.”

What would you say to those people? Wouldn’t you graciously and politely tell them to pick up a copy of philosopher Harry G. Frankfurt’s book On Bullshit?[15] Does democracy mean fulfilling the lustful desires of the oligarchs, almost to the exclusion of everyone else?

The New World Order would have to say yes because the only way its agents have survived over the years is through deceptive means. How else would New World Order agents go about destroying one country after another without any respect for the rule of law and without any apology to the Muslim people?

Once again, the vast majority of Americans did not vote for the war in Iraq (we have been bombing Iraq for more than 25 years[16]), did not ask for a six-trillion dollar bill, did not want thousands upon thousands of dead Americans in the region, did not want to destroy an entire country, but they got all this mess anyway precisely because the oligarchs, namely the Neo-Bolsheviks, started to dominate U.S. foreign policy by the middle of the twentieth century.

The Neo-Bolsheviks call this freedom because they get to satisfy their essentially Talmudic appetite. They also call it democracy because they can tell bumbling Goyim like Rick Santorum and John McCain and John Bolton and Sarah Palin and Michelle Bachman to dance like real puppets and chants things like, “bomb, bomb, bomb Iran.”[17]

Neo-Bolsheviks like Daniel Pipes began to tell the Goyim how to dance in the twentieth century, which we all know by now is “The Jewish Century.”[18] In that century, moral reasoning and political order and consistency became relics of the past and essentially Talmudic discourse progressively became the norm in politics, academe, and even in Hollywood.19]

Photo: David Rockefeller: “Yes, I am a NWO agent–and I’m proud of it.”

But it must be emphasized that long before the Neo-Bolsheviks took over the American culture, oligarchs like the Rockefellers had already laid the groundwork for them. We should also say in passing that the Rockefellers have always been part of the ruling class, which means that they have been cheating the system as well. In fact, David Rockefeller, the only survival grandchild of John D. Rockefeller, admits quite frankly in his Memoirs:

“Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as ‘internationalists’ and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure – one world, if you will. If that’s the charge, I stand guilty and I am proud of it.”[20]

This is indeed a bold statement, but it means nothing if it is not actualized. If we ought to judge a tree by its fruit, then the simple question becomes: what are some of the fruits that the Rockefellers have produced over the years? Were they involved in covert operations? Did their psychological warfare inevitably play a central part in the demographic decline in America?

Read entire article here

Posted by Teri Perticone


Comments are closed.

CLICK HERE to Listen with iTunes, VLC, Winamp, or other players
No Lies Radio Visitors

Join Our Email List

* required



By joining our email list you agree to our Privacy Policy.


November 2018
« Oct    

User Login